Alpine Climbing
Grades
How Do You Know
When A Climber Is Lying? His Lips Are Moving
Soon after crawling out of
the primordial muck and learning to stand more
or less upright, man began to climb. Needing to brag about his accomplishments
afterwards at the bar, he
invented the first grading system. Today there
are a number of grading systems by which modern
man
(or woman) gauges the technical difficulty of rock and ice
climbs, embellishes achievements, and lies to
friends. The two most favored by alpinists
are the International French Adjectival and the
American Ice Grading Systems.
Alpine
Climbing Grades
Rating the difficulty of
alpine climbs is a black art. It
requires factoring the many variables affecting
the seriousness and technical demands of a
route and then distilling it all into one grade;
a task made more difficult given that the only
constant affecting a given route is change.
Alpine climbs are in constant flux, with the
difficulty of a route varying widely from season
to season, day to day, even hour to hour
depending on weather, snow and ice conditions,
the quality of the rock, and the severity of
your hangover.
The generally accepted system
for rating alpine routes is the International
French Adjectival System (IFAS). The IFAS comes
from the long-standing system used in the Alps,
where in addition to a pitch-by-pitch rating,
the Frenchies oftentimes also give a rating
suggesting the overall difficulty of the climb.
The broad nature of the IFAS
takes into account such variables as technical
difficulty, quality of the belays, nature of the
rock, exposure, objective dangers, etcetera. In
addition to the letter combinations of the IFAS,
the symbols "+" and "-" are sometimes added to
indicate nuances between the grades. Confused
yet? Yeah, well.
The International French
Adjectival System rates the difficulty of alpine
climbs as follows:
F (Facile) — Easy; a
straightforward climb; belaying usually
unnecessary; simple glacier approach; easy
scrambling; little objective danger; you could
lead your dog up it
PD (Peu Difficile) —
Moderately difficult; a more challenging climb;
some belaying and protection necessary; more
complex glacier work; harder and/or more exposed
scrambling; apparent objective danger; take a
friend
AD (Assez Difficile) —
Fairly difficult; a moderate, but not strenuous
climb; belaying and protection necessary; snow
and/or ice up to 45- 50-degrees; ice pitches up
to Grade II-III; rock climbing up to 5.6; route
may be long and/or high altitude; there's work
to be done here
D (Difficile) — Difficult; a long,
serious, strenuous climb; snow and/or ice up to
50- 70-degrees; rock climbing harder than 5.7;
encourage your partner to take the sharp end
TD (Tres Difficile) —
Very difficult; a long, serious, strenuous climb
with high objective danger in places; snow
and/or ice up to 50– 70-degrees; perhaps ice
pitches up to Grade III-IV; rock climbing up to
5.8; wear a diaper to hide your fear
ED (Extreme Difficile)
— Extremely difficult; a very serious climb with
strenuous rock/ice/mixed climbing and/or
exceptional objective danger; ED is often
additionally sub-graded 1 through 4 (i.e. ED2);
you’re both gonna’ die
Ice
Climbing Grades
The American Ice Grading
System has its roots in the Scottish Winter
Grading System. As you might well imagine, the
Scots are nuts and don’t know a thing about ice
climbing despite the generally held consensus
that they invented it. To this day, their idea
if “ice climbing” involves drinking whisky until
the wee hours, and then, either severely
hung-over or in an alcoholic stupor, spending
the day in a sleet storm
swinging dull tools at clumps of barely frozen grass. Afterwards
it's back to the pub for more drinking.
Ice climbing grades are
highly variable by region, constantly evolving,
and useful only as rough guess as to how a given
route might form during an average winter. The
WI (Water Ice) designation is applied to
seasonal climbs such as waterfalls, while the AI
(Alpine Ice) designation is applied to
year-round climbs such as high altitude
couloirs. The AI and WI designations are
pretty much interchangeable, with the general understanding
that AI climbs are half a grade in difficulty
easier than WI climbs of the same grade. In
fact, many
times AI routes are no more than steep snow
climbs.
The American Ice Grading
System rates the difficulty of ice climbs as
follows:
WI-1 — Easy slab;
possible to walk up ice with the use of
crampons, and generally without the need for
tools or protection; perhaps occasional short,
steeper sections; flat foot technique; imagine a
frozen driveway
WI-2 — Easy climbing;
a pitch of reasonably consistent 60– 70-degree
ice with a few short, steep steps; good
protection and belays; easy front-pointing;
bring a date you want to impress
WI-3 — More difficult
climbing; generally thick and solid 70–
80-degree ice; occasional short, steep sections,
but with good rests, protection, and belays;
more difficult front-pointing; here’s where you
start to get tired
WI-4 — Strenuous
climbing; sustained, generally good quality 75–
85-degree ice; satisfactory protection and
belays; occasional less vertical section; now
you’re tired and scared
WI-5 — Strenuous
climbing on a longer route; 85– 90-degree ice;
sometimes featureless, but often with areas of
chandeliers or difficult bulges; bring a change
for that diaper
WI-6 — Very strenuous
climbing on a vertical, sometimes overhanging
route; sections of thin or highly technical
climbing; difficult protection from precarious
stances; you guessed it — you’re both gonna’ die
Okay, So
... What Does It All Mean?
If you’re still vexed as to
how all this applies to you and your experience,
don’t fret. In fact, we understand that none
other than Sylvester Stallone — that mumbling paradigm of
studlyness — didn’t know squat about grading
systems before he made that excellent and very
realistic movie, Cliffhanger … and look at what a
good little climber he turned out to be.
To learn more about how to
pull it all together and choose the right
expedition, go to
Which
Expedition For Me?